Acronyms that contain the term peace enforcement
What does peace enforcement mean? This page is about the various possible meanings of the acronym, abbreviation, shorthand or slang term: peace enforcement.
'Institute for Development, Democracy and Peace'
A Cry For Peace
Adore Christ For Peace
Adult Singles At Peace
Advanced Civil Speed Enforcement System
Advanced Law Enforcement Response Technology
Africa Peace Education Program
African Union Peace and Security Council
Alcohol Law Enforcement
Aldermaston Womens Peace Campaign
AM-1600, Queen of Peace Radio, Atlantic Beach, Florida
American Committee for Peace in Chechnya
American Peace Network
Americans for Peace Now
Analysis Product Promotion Legislation and Enforcement
Anthro Green Peace
Anti-Virus Policy Enforcement
Application of the Behavioral Sciences to the Strategies of Peace
Approved Enforcement Agency
Area Law Enforcement and Retailers Team
Army Law Enforcement Responder Technologies
Associate Peace Corps Director
Association For Children For Enforcement Of Support
Association for Children of Enforcement of Support
Association of Asian Parliaments for Peace
What does peace enforcement mean?
- Peace enforcement
- Peace enforcement is a practice of ensuring peace in an area or region. Part of a three-part scale between peacekeeping and peacemaking, it is sometimes considered to be the midpoint. Peace enforcement is different from peacemaking where options, possibly including force, are used to bring conflicting parties to negotiations. While it is an approach to maintaining an existing peace, and can thus only be done by an outside party which is recognized as neutral, this is differentiated from peacekeeping largely in the level of force the outside group is willing to use in response to violations of the established peace. The difference between peace enforcement and peacekeeping: Peacekeeping, a role the U.N. has played over the years, is relatively straightforward and, despite its difficulties, comparatively easy. Peacekeeping involves monitoring and enforcing a cease-fire agreed to by two or more former combatants. It proceeds in an atmosphere where peace exists and where the former combatants minimally prefer peace to continued war. Peace-enforcement, as it is used by the Joint Staff, entails the physical interposition of armed forces to separate ongoing combatants to create a cease-fire that does not exist. Boutros-Ghali, on the other hand, uses the term to refer to actions to keep a cease-fire from being violated or to reinstate a failed cease-fire. It is a subtle difference, but it does imply the existence of some will for peace. The American version more realistically portrays another, far more difficult matter. By definition, in a situation for which peace-enforcement is a potentially appropriate response, war and not peace describes the situation, and one or more of the combatants prefer it that way. This means that, unlike peacekeepers, peace enforcers are often not welcomed by one or either side. Rather, they are active fighters who must impose a cease-fire that is opposed by one or both combatants; in the process, the neutrality that distinguishes peacekeepers will most likely be lost.