Acronyms that contain the term peace enforcement
What does peace enforcement mean? This page is about the various possible meanings of the acronym, abbreviation, shorthand or slang term: peace enforcement.
We've found a total of 840 shorthands for peace enforcement:
Policy Enforcement Point
Drug Enforcement Administration
Justice of the Peace
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Religion Of Peace
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program
Alcohol Law Enforcement
Orthodox Peace Fellowship
Team Approach Regarding Gang Enforcement Techniques
Veterans For Peace, Inc.
Enforcement and Compliance History Online
Oklahoma Code Enforcement Association
Human Development Peace Commission
Treaty of Peace and Friendship
Quaker Peace Education Project
Peace Officers' Memorial Foundation
Brighton Peace and Environment Centre
Alaska Peace Officers Association
Kentucky Vehicle Enforcement
Global Partners in Peace and Development
Peace and Justice Works
Child Support Enforcement
NUST Campus Dialogue Peace Project
Interagency Trade Enforcement Center
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interests
What does peace enforcement mean?
- Peace enforcement
- Peace enforcement is a practice of ensuring peace in an area or region. Part of a three-part scale between peacekeeping and peacemaking, it is sometimes considered to be the midpoint. Peace enforcement is different from peacemaking where options, possibly including force, are used to bring conflicting parties to negotiations. While it is an approach to maintaining an existing peace, and can thus only be done by an outside party which is recognized as neutral, this is differentiated from peacekeeping largely in the level of force the outside group is willing to use in response to violations of the established peace. The difference between peace enforcement and peacekeeping: Peacekeeping, a role the U.N. has played over the years, is relatively straightforward and, despite its difficulties, comparatively easy. Peacekeeping involves monitoring and enforcing a cease-fire agreed to by two or more former combatants. It proceeds in an atmosphere where peace exists and where the former combatants minimally prefer peace to continued war. Peace-enforcement, as it is used by the Joint Staff, entails the physical interposition of armed forces to separate ongoing combatants to create a cease-fire that does not exist. Boutros-Ghali, on the other hand, uses the term to refer to actions to keep a cease-fire from being violated or to reinstate a failed cease-fire. It is a subtle difference, but it does imply the existence of some will for peace. The American version more realistically portrays another, far more difficult matter. By definition, in a situation for which peace-enforcement is a potentially appropriate response, war and not peace describes the situation, and one or more of the combatants prefer it that way. This means that, unlike peacekeepers, peace enforcers are often not welcomed by one or either side. Rather, they are active fighters who must impose a cease-fire that is opposed by one or both combatants; in the process, the neutrality that distinguishes peacekeepers will most likely be lost.